(281) 201-3544
  • Contact Us
Encino Environmental ServicesEncino Environmental ServicesEncino Environmental ServicesEncino Environmental Services
  • About
    • Careers
    • Locations
    • Leadership
    • ESG
  • Industries
    • Oil & Gas
    • LNG
    • Data Centers
    • Manufacturing
    • Landfills
    • Agriculture
  • Compliance Services
    • Flare & ECD Net Heat Value (NHV) Vent Gas Testing
    • Stack Testing
    • Engine Performance Testing
    • LDAR Services
    • Enclosed Combustion Device (ECD) Performance Testing
    • Catalyst Washing Services
    • Instrumentation Calibration
    • Pressure Relief Valve (PRV) Testing & Valve Greasing
  • Monitoring
    • Continuous Emissions Monitoring
    • Mobile Continuous Emissions Monitoring
    • EmSat™ Satellite Emissions Detection
    • Flare Monitoring
  • Products
    • OGI Handheld & Fixed Cameras
    • Enviromech™ Composite Thief Hatch
    • MOLE-DAS™ Combustion Intelligence System
    • SNITCH™ Tank Vapor Intelligence System
  • Advisory
    • Data Services and Management
    • ESG and GHG Reporting
    • Permitting and Regulatory Reporting
    • OGMP 2.0 Methane Reporting Support
  • News & Resources
    • All Blogs
    • FAQs
    • Press and Events
    • White Papers | Case Studies
....

Navigating the EPA Final Rule for Methane Reduction: Solutions for Oil and Gas Operators Subjected to NSPS OOOOb and More

By Encino | Appendix K, Continuous Emissions Monitoring, Emissions Monitoring, Emissions Reduction, LDAR, OOOOb, Optical Gas Imaging, Regulations and Initiatives | 0 comment | 5 July, 2024 | 0

Introduction to NSPS OOOOb

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the adoption of a comprehensive regulatory framework with its Final Rule for Methane Reduction (NSPS OOOOb, in addition to OOOOc and Appendix K), aimed at curbing methane emissions from the oil and gas industry. This is the first of several articles we are developing to help operators understand the implications of the 1,690-page rule for their existing and anticipated well sites and facilities and compliance solutions. This is a short overview, and we plan to issue more in-depth articles in the near future.

General Factors

Applicability Date Extension. Operators can breathe a small sigh of relief knowing that the applicability date for Subpart OOOOa has been extended to December 6, 2022, from November 15, 2021, as originally proposed. Pushing back the applicability date allows affected facilities that began operations between September 18, 2015, and December 6, 2022, to continue with the current OOOOa practices.

Alternative Technologies and Tiered Approach. The rule now permits the use of various alternative technologies or combinations thereof for leak detection for well sites, centralized production facilities, and compressor stations. This flexibility provides operators with opportunities to tailor their emissions monitoring and compliance strategies to the needs of specific locations and their strategic emissions reduction goals.

For example, the table below summarizes the screening frequency with minimum detection threshold of the technology used for the screening at well site, centralized production facilities, and compressor stations subject to AVO inspections with quarterly OGI or EPA Method 21 monitoring (this table is just one of several in the final rule).

Source: EPA Final Rule 40 CFR Part 60, RIN 2060-AV16 (Table 1 to Subpart OOOOb of Part 60—Alternative Technology Periodic Screening Frequency at Well Sites, Centralized Production Facilities, and Compressor Stations Subject to AVO Inspections with Quarterly OGI or EPA Method 21 Monitoring, p. 1295)

Importantly, the rule establishes detection performance standards, instead of mandating specific technologies.

Adopting an alternative monitoring technology will require owners and operators, rather than solely technology providers, to demonstrate the required emission reduction equivalence of the alternative monitoring program with respect to OGI or EPA Method 21 performance. The implication is that a specification sheet or marketing collateral from a vendor is not enough to evidence that a specific technology meets the minimum detection requirements. Modeling of emission reductions equivalence will be required.

EmVision™ QOGI CEMSLDAR Services

Super-Emitter Program

The Super-Emitter Program will be in effect and includes some potentially controversial elements.

Definition of Super Emitter Event. EPA defined an event with an emission rate of 100 kg/hr or more as a super emitter event, the same way it was originally proposed in the December 2022 supplemental proposal.

Certified Third-Party Verifiers. EPA will accredit each third-party verifier individually. It was noted that third-party verifiers are restricted to using satellite or airborne technologies. Other non-remote sensing technologies are not approved (e.g., excluding OGI, since it will require close access to a facility).

Flow of Information. Notably, the Super Emitter Program has reshaped the flow of information. Third-party notifiers, previously certified or approved by the EPA, will notify the EPA of a super emitter event. As it was originally proposed, third-party verifiers would send notice directly to owners and operators along with EPA, but in a nod to rumblings of potential legal challenges to the Constitutionality of that proposal, EPA is now the official notifier of a super emitter event. Per the final rule, the EPA will evaluate the received data and subsequently send notifications to operators and owners.

The Super Emitter Program supplements the periodic monitoring and repair work practice standards in NSPS OOOOb (and OOOOc after implemented by States) by requiring repair of the source of the super-emitter event. However, if the event happens on a OOOOa affected facility (e.g., tank subject to OOOOa with an open thief hatch), the program will serve as a notice only, and does not impose a requirement to remediate the problem (e.g., close the thief hatch).

The final rule includes amendments to NSPS OOOO and OOOOa to incorporate the requirement to investigate and report whether the super emitter event was caused by OOOO/OOOOa affected facility or associated equipment.

EmSat™ Satellite Methane Detection

New Focus on Tank Battery Emissions

Emissions Reduction. The final rule includes an important addition to what was originally proposed by requiring storage vessels (i.e., tank batteries) to demonstrate a substantial 95% reduction in methane and VOC (volatile organic compound) emissions.

This requirement raises several issues, such as:

  • What is the baseline from which the 95% reduction will be measured?
  • What technologies are approved for evidencing the reduction?
  • How does this requirement dovetail with the Waste Emission Charge (WEC) mandated by the Inflation Reduction Act?

We will be delving into more detail on answering these questions in future articles.

We do know that significant sources of tank battery emissions include worn thief hatches and seals. The Enviromech™ Composite Thief Hatch ensures a complete seal of the tank over the long-term and in varying weather conditions, reducing emissions and improving well site safety.

Additionally, the Enviromech Composite Thief Hatch is made of extremely durable composite material that is highly resistant to changes in environmental conditions, reducing maintenance, repair and replacement costs.

Enviromech™ Composite Thief Hatch

Handhelds (OGI Cameras) for Comprehensive Compliance

Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) inspections are required for an expanded list of equipment along with specific flow rate requirements.

Process Controller Monitoring. Process controllers must undergo optical gas imaging (OGI) monitoring to maintain a methane emission rate of zero.

Wet Seal Centrifugal Compressors. Wet seal centrifugal compressors necessitate a substantial 95% reduction in methane and VOC emissions. LDAR is required. In addition, volumetric flow rates for compressor seals must be maintained at or below 3 scfm (9 scfm for Alaska).

Dry Seal Centrifugal Compressors. Dry seal centrifugal compressors require LDAR to ensure volumetric flow rates of 2 scfm or less.

Natural Gas-Driven Pumps. Pumps driven by natural gas must maintain zero methane and VOC emissions.

Natural Gas Processing Plants. Natural gas processing plants can follow LDAR with OGI following Appendix K, or alternatively, use Method 21.

Fugitive Emissions Monitoring. The final rule mandates fugitive emissions monitoring requirements as follows:

LDAR Services & Cameras
Source: EPA Final Rule 40 CFR Part 60, RIN 2060-AV16 (Table 26—Summary of Final EG Subpart OOOOc Presumptive Non-Numerical Standards, p. 681)

Phasing Out Routine Flaring

The final rule mandates a phase-out of routine flaring of natural gas from new oil wells, with a 2-year transition period. Many States regulatory agencies have been resisting a comprehensive ban on routine flaring, but the EPA has now made it official that the practice of routine flaring will be phased out.

Table 16 from the rule text provides a summary of allowance to routinely route associated gas to a flare or control device for NSPS OOOOb.

Source: EPA Final Rule 40 CFR Part 60, RIN 2060-AV16 (Table 16—Summary of Allowance to Routinely Route Associated Gas to a Flare or Control Device for NSPS OOOOb, p. 256)

EPA noted that “…the final rule provides a pathway to allow for the use of VISR (Video Imaging Spectral Radiometry), Simplified VISR, or other similar technology. In this pathway, an owner or operator could request an alternative test method to use a technology such as VISR that continuously monitors combustion efficiency or a technology such as Simplified VISR that continuously monitors NHVcz and NHVdil. The approval of such a request may be site-specific or may instead become broadly applicable, approved for a class of combustion devices, and listed on the EPA’s website as an alternative test method” (Source: EPA Final Rule 40 CFR Part 60, RIN 2060-AV16, Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review, p. 577).

Encino Environmental can help operators navigate this transition, potentially by incorporating Agni technology for flare monitoring and visual flame confirmation.

AGNI High Definition Cameras for Flare Monitoring

Net Heating Value (NHV) Trailer Sampling Adjustments

Sampling Frequency Reduction. Sampling frequency for NHV trailers has been reduced to twice daily, for 14 days (28 samples).  Each individual sample must have a minimum time of collection of at least one hour, with consecutive samples separated by at least 6 hours.  If gas is intermittent (absence of gas when sampling), sampling should continue beyond the 14-day period until a minimum of 28 samples are collected.  This replaced the previous hourly requirement over 10 days. Additionally, ongoing demonstrations are necessary, with three sampling activities every 5 years.

It is important to note that the samples must be taken during the period with the lowest expected NHV.  Also, operators can request an alternative test method that demonstrates that the flare or enclosed combustion device reduces methane and VOC by 95% by weight or greater.

Mobile Engine Testing

Continuous Monitoring Systems

The rule includes provisions for the use of advanced methane detection technologies that allow for continuous monitoring for fugitive emissions and emissions from covers and closed vent systems (CVS).  The EPA also acknowledged that this type of methane detection technology could be used to identify super-emitter emissions events sooner.

We will be analyzing the rule closely and publishing our evaluation in a future article.

Continuous Emissions Monitoring (CEMS)

Summary

EPA’s adoption of its Final Rule for Methane Reduction (colloquially know as NSPS 0000b rule) marks a pivotal moment for the Oil & Gas industry, requiring operators to adopt innovative approaches for emissions reduction and compliance. The rule is comprehensive and voluminous, consisting of 1,690 pages, and as a practical matter it will take time to fully analyze. This overview is just the first of several articles we plan to publish to help the industry and clients both meet compliance requirements and achieve their voluntary emissions reduction goals.

Encino Environmental, with its cutting-edge technologies and expertise, stands as a valuable ally for operators striving to meet these stringent regulations efficiently and sustainably.

Utilizing SENSIA‘s industry leading handheld and fixed OGI solutions or providing them to clients to do so internally, Encino is well positioned to support industry even more in the future. Our bundled emissions offerings from ongoing monitoring to testing and compliance to reduction allow clients to maximize efficiency and cost effectiveness of solutions. Bundling services can also generate efficiencies and cost savings.

Together, we can work towards a cleaner, more environmentally responsible future.

Got questions on OOOOb and the Final Rule for Methane Reduction? Contact us today at (281) 201-3544 or support@encinoenviron.com for a free consultation and evaluation of how Encino can help you achieve environmental performance and compliance that generate economic results.

About Encino Environmental Services

Formed in 2010 and headquartered in Houston, Texas, Encino Environmental Services, LLC is an emissions performance testing and monitoring firm that specializes in environmental consulting, combustion analysis, LDAR (leak detection and repair) services, and CEMS (continuous emissions monitoring systems) technology.

Equipment from Sensia Solutions, a subsidiary of Encino, allows the integration of thermography and AI analytics for the leak detection and quantification (LDAQ) needs. Also, through its joint venture with Satlantis LLC, Encino hosts remote sensing technologies leveraging satellites for the monitoring of methane emissions, as well as advanced environmental data platforms for the measurement and minimization of emissions.

Encino supports permitting, regulatory compliance and strategic ESG initiatives across the U.S. covering all major oil and gas basins and select international markets.

No tags.

Related Posts

  • OGMP 2.0 Annual Conference Signals a More Measurement-Driven Future for Methane Management

    By Encino | 0 comment

    The 2026 OGMP 2.0 Annual Implementation Conference reinforced a message that is becoming increasingly clear across the energy sector: methane measurement is no longer just about reporting. It is becoming a critical tool for understandingRead more

  • EPA’s Proposals to Modify Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) Practices: A Focus on Appendix K and Its Impact on OGI Equipment

    By Encino | 0 comment

    Just over two years ago, on November 2, 2021, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) unveiled a series of proposed changes to the Leak Detection and Repair (LDAR) practices, including a protocol for using optical gasRead more

  • WHITE PAPER: Best Practices for Emissions Monitoring in the Energy Sector

    By Encino | 0 comment

    Best Practices for Emissions Monitoring in the Energy Sector The Energy Transition is underway. The move to decarbonize the global energy system by shifting away from fossil fuels to adopting greater use of renewable energyRead more

  • Reducing Methane Emissions in the Oil and Gas Sector: The Super-Emitter Response Program

    By Encino | 0 comment

    On December 6, 2022, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) threw another rock into the regulatory pond sending ripples of uncertainty and concern throughout the Oil & Gas industry when it published a supplemental proposedRead more

  • Navigating the World of Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS) in Oil & Gas

    By Encino | 0 comment

    The United Nations Global Methane Assessment reported that more than half of global methane emissions are human-caused, having oil and gas extraction accounting for 23% of the total. Importantly, the report points out that theRead more

  • EPAs Waste Emissions Charge - A Taxing Proposition

    EPA’s Waste Emissions Charge – A Taxing Proposition

    By Encino | 0 comment

    In October 2023[AE1] [JC2] [JC3] , we published our blog article Reducing Methane Emissions in the Oil and Gas Sector: The Super-Emitter Response Program previewing the major components of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Super Emitter Response Program included in the agency’s comprehensive update to 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart OOOOb, which focuses on standards of performance for crude oil and natural gas facilities. In this article we cover the final form of the Super-Emitter Response Program that was published in the Federal Register on March 8, 2024.

Categories

  • Appendix K
  • Careers
  • Case Study
  • CEDRI
  • Certified Gas
  • Continuous Emissions Monitoring
  • Data Centers
  • Emissions Monitoring
  • Emissions Reduction
  • Engine Testing
  • Events
  • FAQ
  • Flare Monitoring
  • Instrument Calibration
  • LDAR
  • LNG Industry
  • Methane Monitoring
  • Newsletter Article
  • OGMP 2.0
  • Oil & Gas Industry
  • OOOOb
  • Optical Gas Imaging
  • Permitting and Regulatory Reporting
  • Press Release
  • Regulations and Initiatives
  • RNG
  • Satellite Emissions Monitoring
  • Satellite Monitoring
  • Stack Emissions Testing
  • Thief Hatch
  • Video
  • Waste Emissions Charge
  • White Paper

Recent Posts

  • The New Data Center Playbook Starts with Power
  • From CERAWeek 2026: Why Energy Security, Infrastructure Constraints, and Emissions Performance Are Becoming More Connected
  • EPA’s New Title V Permit Renewal Guidance Could Reduce Red Tape, but Facilities Still Need a Strong Technical Foundation
  • EPA Final Set 2 Rule Signals Growth for Biofuels and Agriculture
  • Business Development Manager – Dallas, TX
Encino Environmental Services

Comprehensive Emissions Monitoring
& Compliance Solutions for Critial Infrastructure


We believe the future of industry belongs to those who proactively manage emissions and invest in the data, expertise, and solutions needed to support compliance, reduce emissions, and operate responsibly.

Explore Encino

  • Emissions Monitoring | Methane Detection Solutions
  • Compliance Services
  • Advisory Services
  • News & Resources
  • Careers
  • Encino Environmental Services Privacy Policy

Encino Environmental Services

HEADQUARTERS

20302 Park Row Drive
Suite 1200
Katy, Texas 77449
(281) 201-3544


View all Encino Locations

© Copyright 2026 Encino Environmental Services | All Rights Reserved |
  • About
    • Careers
    • Locations
    • Leadership
    • ESG
  • Industries
    • Oil & Gas
    • LNG
    • Data Centers
    • Manufacturing
    • Landfills
    • Agriculture
  • Compliance Services
    • Flare & ECD Net Heat Value (NHV) Vent Gas Testing
    • Stack Emissions Testing
    • Engine Emissions Performance Testing
    • Leak Detection & Repair (LDAR)
    • Enclosed Combustion Device (ECD) Performance Testing
    • Catalyst Washing Services
    • Instrumentation Calibration Services
    • Pressure Relief Valve (PRV) Testing & Valve Greasing
  • Monitoring
    • EmSat™ Satellite Emissions Detection
    • Continuous Emissions Monitoring
    • Mobile Continuous Emissions Monitoring
    • Flare Monitoring
  • Products
    • OGI Cameras
    • Enviromech™ Composite Thief Hatch
    • MOLE-DAS™ Combustion Intelligence System
    • SNITCH™ Tank Vapor Intelligence System
  • Advisory Services
    • Data Services and Management
    • ESG and GHG Reporting
    • Permitting and Regulatory Reporting
    • OGMP 2.0 Methane Reporting Support
  • News & Resources
  • Contact
Encino Environmental Services